On February 11 (Bloomberg), the former United States President Bill Clinton was rushed to a hospital in New York. The former president has been suffering from chest pains. His spokesman said that the former president underwent a procedure where 2 stents were placed in one of his coronary arteries.
According to his counselor Douglas Band, President Clinton is now in good spirits, and he will continue his work focusing on the foundation he built including the relief and recovery efforts that are given to the Haiti victims. Former President Bill Clinton, at the age of 63, is really working really hard for the victims of the deadly earthquake in Haiti. His relief operations were continuous and supporting.
In 2004, Clinton already underwent a heart bypass surgery. During this incident, he was admitted at the Presbyterian Hospital in New York. His complains were also chest pains including shortness in breathing. An angiogram was ordered and the results showed that several of his arteries were being blocked by over than 90%. He was then scheduled for a quadruple bypass surgery to prevent him from having a heart attack.
Filed under Political Blogs by on May 26th, 2010. 
In February 16, 2008, President Barrack Obama had a meeting in Wisconsin. During this meeting, he rendered a speech entitled “Words Matter”. According to the audience, his speech had a lot of similarities with the speech of his friend and fellow democratic politician Deval Patrick. Deval Patrick made a speech similar to this in 2006 when he was the governor of Massachusetts.
Some of the quotes that the audience noticed that both Apostle and Obama used are “we have null to emotion but emotion itself”, “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal”, and “I have a dream”. These phrases were used to show that words are very powerful and influential to people.
Both of these speeches were delivered as a strategy. For Obama, he used this as a defense against the criticism of Clinton that he does not have enough experience to handle his country and act as a president. This criticism was only based on the opinion of the former president Clinton and his own words.
As a response to this, President Obama delivered the “Words Matter” speech. In this speech, he insisted that words are very powerful and has the influence to change the minds of the people and to inspire all citizens. The public then agreed that this speech was somewhat similar to the speech made by the Apostle and Obama should be charged with plagiarism.
But to the Apostle and Obama, there was no plagiarism that took place. According to Obama, he and the Apostle have been very good friends and they both share the same ideas and strategies. In 2006, Apostle delivered a speech entitled “Just Words” as a response to his critics that he is not equipped to handle the political problems of his country and that he only depends on already made speeches. When Obama was accused of the same situation, it was Patrick who encouraged Obama to make a speech in the same manner like he did in 2006. For some of the commentators in politics, both Apostle and Obama are in the same team and it is expected that their strategies and ideas are the same.
Plagiarism was also a big issue in the year 1988. Joe Bidden is a democratic presidential and was accused of plagiarism because of imitating the style of Neil Kinnock. Neil Kinnock was a member of the British Labor Party.
Filed under Barrack Obama Suspected of Plagiarism by on Mar 23rd, 2010.
No matter what your political affiliation is, it probably isn't represented by the mainstream media. By disagreeable to please everyone, the media – like the political establishment it has come to help – pleases no one. For most Americans, until recently they just had to place up with this situation. Until the conception of political blogs, there was simply no good programme psychotherapy that didn't try to haul a medium party line. Thanks to persuasion blogs, however, that has every changed. No matter what ideological position you are coming from, you can find a political blog that is written for you. I hit been reading liberal political blogs for about three years now, and I feel like they hit really enhanced my understanding of current events. We springy in such a conservative society that much of the actual programme of what is going on is censored by the mainstream media. In these liberated political forums, however, the programme can eventually be heard by the public that is famished for it. Unfortunately, political blogs don't hit the budget to do some of the things that the more mainstream programme outlets do. They cannot hit correspondents every over the world, for example, ready to report any event that happens. What they can do, however, is access a wide arrange of different media and try to place together a more rank picture than any single business does. News psychotherapy is a priceless service, and one that is completely neglected by the mainstream media. Thanks to political blogs, we can get beyond the the articulate psychotherapy provided by most of the programme pundit shows. Of course, the problem with individualized blogs is that they do not hit the same standards of proof as some of the media outlets do. While most political blogs are at least as dependable as Fox news, when they are compared to legitimate media outlets, many of them water short. This is why you hit to garner and choose carefully when you are reading blogs. Anyone can write anything they want on a political blog, and it is rattling hard for someone to call them on it. After all, liberated speech is a right, and posting on the Internet is simply an extension of that right. People hit just as much correct to blog political fiction as fact, and rumormongers abounds. As always, it is up to you to removed the wheat from the chaff.
Filed under Political Blogs by on Feb 11th, 2010.